Operating surveillance and production intelligence, with an achieved-result claim kept separate from wider agent plans.
Company
Presidio Production
Department
Production & field operations
Record type
company_adoption
Disclosed stage
Operating: approximately 2,000 wells on intelligence platform; field engineers receive DOUG recommendations. This is not fleet-wide autonomous control.
Source date
2026-08-17
Source-date precision
day
Source provenance
A · Operator filing
Review disposition
Source-attributed; not an independent validation
Reported result
Operator reports 2.3% AI-linked production uplift through Q2: 1.4 points from DOUG and nearly 1 point from adjacent initiatives. DOUG averaged ~400 boe/d over the prior three months. Controllers on 24 wells: 2,680 to 2,946 Mcf/day, roughly 10% on that population. Weekend production reportedly rose 2.5%, with comparison baseline undisclosed. These overlap the program total; do not add them. $4.5m annualized revenue covers the initiatives, not net cash or DOUG alone. August 17 deck repeats 2.3% YTD, targets 3–5%, and cites ~2,300 platform wells on its GOAL slide. $2.5m per uplift point is illustrative revenue sensitivity.
What this does not establish
Company-reported attribution; no independent counterfactual or full costs. The August 11 release says ~1%, August 12 remarks report 2.3%, and August 17 slides repeat 2.3% YTD; dates and populations need reconciliation. The Q2 call describes ~2,000 platform wells; the goal slide cites ~2,300. Platform coverage is not proof that every well is under autonomous control. Budget agents, acquisition screening and full-fleet orchestration remain roadmap items. $4.5m annualized revenue across initiatives and $2.5m per uplift point are different measures; neither is net cash ROI. No-new-drilling or no-capex language does not disclose software, controller, staffing or support costs. Controller pre/post periods, matched wells, decline adjustments, weekend baseline and controller safeguards remain unspecified. The 24 controller wells are a separate population from platform coverage.
The issuer connects field surveillance, staff knowledge and operating recommendations. The wider agent program and production target require follow-through; comparable net returns remain undisclosed.
Slides 15–18 (SEC document lines 122–146); AI deployment, input data and live-versus-target distinctions; slides 13 and 26 for selected acquisition case studies and pump-by-exception routing
Slides 20–23; current surveillance versus 2026 deployment column on slide 21; GOAL slide 23
Disclosure history
FTW Technologies live AI well surveillance and production intelligence at Presidio
Presidio says a 24/7 AI surveillance tool is live in well surveillance and production intelligence and available to all operators and engineers. Users can query live production data in natural language. The underlying well-intelligence layer combines field pumper voice/text observations with well files, drilling and completion reports, production volumes, and geology. Operations staff remain central; an asset-intelligence group uses analytics to drive field efficiencies. The deck also describes machine-learning pump-by-exception routing: high-cash-flow wells receive daily visits and other wells are visited on exceptions; field crews remain responsible for action.
Company-reported attribution; no independent counterfactual or full costs. The August 11 release says ~1%, August 12 remarks report 2.3%, and August 17 slides repeat 2.3% YTD; dates and populations need reconciliation. The Q2 call describes ~2,000 platform wells; the goal slide cites ~2,300. Platform coverage is not proof that every well is under autonomous control. Budget agents, acquisition screening and full-fleet orchestration remain roadmap items. $4.5m annualized revenue across initiatives and $2.5m per uplift point are different measures; neither is net cash ROI. No-new-drilling or no-capex language does not disclose software, controller, staffing or support costs. Controller pre/post periods, matched wells, decline adjustments, weekend baseline and controller safeguards remain unspecified. The 24 controller wells are a separate population from platform coverage.
DOUG surveillance, weekend routing and plunger optimization: Q2 update
Presidio’s Q2 call distinguishes DOUG recommendations, weekend visit routing and automatic plunger-cycle adjustments. DOUG alerts field engineers; pumpers receive a prioritized map. Controllers on 24 wells continuously adjust cycle timing. Management says field judgment remains with staff; controller safeguards are unspecified.
Already-reviewed source, not a new deployment. No matched control, decline adjustment or full costs. Existing $4.5m annualized program revenue is not net cash. Platform coverage (~2,000 call / ~2,300 later goal slide) is not controller coverage.
August presentation: achieved uplift, platform scope and 2026 roadmap
The August deck repeats 2.3% YTD AI-linked production uplift and a 3–5% 2026 target. It describes live surveillance and natural-language production queries. Its goal slide cites roughly 2,300 platform wells; fleet-wide agentic orchestration, budget agents and automatic acquisition screening appear in the 2026 deployment column, not the NOW column.
Company-reported attribution; no independent counterfactual or full costs. The August 11 release says ~1%, August 12 remarks report 2.3%, and August 17 slides repeat 2.3% YTD; dates and populations need reconciliation. The Q2 call describes ~2,000 platform wells; the goal slide cites ~2,300. Platform coverage is not proof that every well is under autonomous control. Budget agents, acquisition screening and full-fleet orchestration remain roadmap items. $4.5m annualized revenue across initiatives and $2.5m per uplift point are different measures; neither is net cash ROI. No-new-drilling or no-capex language does not disclose software, controller, staffing or support costs.
A source grade describes provenance, not independent verification. This is a research profile, not a measure of net return. Report a correction.